AUVerifiedPeps
Is AUVerifiedPeps legit? What the records show
We have tracked AUVerifiedPeps since Nov 2026 and follow 22 of their products, covering 15 peptides. Prices run from A$29.00 to A$375.00. On their own certificates, 2 of 2 measured vials are more than 3% over or under the amount on the label.
Check it yourself: find the report number or QR code on a certificate and look it up on the lab's own website.
Higher than 90% of the 894 shops we score
Max 60 until we lab-test them.
The shaded part is the shops AUVerifiedPeps scores higher than.
Our lab testLocked / 40Not tested yet
We have not sent a AUVerifiedPeps product to an independent lab yet, so these 40 points are locked. The lab report will go on this page when we do.
Reviews6.4 / 20Good rating, few reviews
External review sites: ★ 4.4 ± 0.1 average, from under 50 reviews. We show a range because sites round their ratings differently.
That gives 6.4 of 20.
Community4.5 / 15Little or cautious talk
Forum and Reddit talk is thin or cautious. Nobody has left a review on Peptide Scanner yet.
That gives 4.5 of 15.
Certificates16.3 / 2510 of 15 peptides covered
Publishing: 12 of 15. We hold 21 lab certificates from their website, naming Janoshik and Ozcanium Analytics. We found 16 of the 21 on the issuing lab's own website (not every lab has a public lookup). 10 of the 15 peptides we track have a matching certificate from an independent lab (any size counts). 0 of the 21 certificates include a contamination test (endotoxin, sterility or heavy metals). 7 of 13 dated certificates were issued in the last 6 months. Newest: Oct 2026 (2 weeks old). Oldest: Mar 2026.
Claims match: 4.3 of 10. Their own certificates against their claims: 1 of 14 measured vials are within 3% of the label (7 overfilled, 6 underfilled); 3 of 6 certificates fall below 98% purity.
Their claims against their certificates: 2 of 2 measured vials off label.
A certificate is the shop's own document. It is not our test.
AUVerifiedPeps reviews
No reviews on Peptide Scanner yet.
Bought from AUVerifiedPeps?
Write a reviewAUVerifiedPeps prices
Checked 7 Nov 2026
Show all 22 prices ↓Showing all 22 prices
Ships to: Australia
Their certificates vs their claims
No site-wide purity promise found on their website. Vial content is still checked against the label.
- certificates read
- 16
- vials outside ±3% of label
- 2 / 2
- beyond ±10% (major)
- 2
- site-wide purity claim to check
- None
How this is checked
- Vial content
- Measured net peptide content against the size on the label. Within ±3% is on label, 3 to 10% is off label, beyond ±10% is a major deviation (under- or overfilled). When a certificate weighs several vials of the batch, the vial farthest from the label is the one judged, and with several purity results the lowest counts. Blends are only checked when the certificate lists each component.
- Purity
- HPLC purity on each certificate against the purity the supplier promises site-wide on its own website. Up to 1 point below the claim is amber, more than that is red. Only a direct promise counts (“99%+ purity guaranteed”); explanations of what purity means, one product's figure and page code are not treated as a claim. A certificate that reports only a bound (“>99%”) is judged only when the bound meets the claim, and a specification line is never read as a result.
- Whose certificate
- A certificate is only read once our client-identity review has looked at it, and one issued to a different company is left out. A certificate issued to the company that runs the supplier's own website counts as the supplier's. A file hosted on another supplier's website is not counted for this one. Only peptide certificates are read: bacteriostatic water, acetic acid and other diluents are left out, and so are product data sheets, which state a specification rather than a batch result.
- Main impurity
- Shown when the certificate itemises it: a named impurity (TFA, deletion sequence, oxidation…) or the largest secondary peak in the HPLC peak table. Most certificates report only a purity figure, so the rest of the sample is not itemised.
- Score
- These checks are 10 of the 25 certificate points: vial content 7 (full credit within ±3%, half up to ±10%, none beyond, over- and underfilled alike), purity 3 (98% is the bar when a supplier advertises no figure). Fewer than 5 readable results gives half credit rather than a guess.
- Source and limits
- These are the supplier's own published certificates, read automatically from the PDF or image. Janoshik results tables are read twice from the image, cell by cell, and a figure the two readings disagree on is left out rather than guessed. A certificate covers one batch on one date. We have not tested these batches ourselves.
| Product | Label to measured | Purity | Main impurity | Lab | Certificate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHK-Cu 100mg | 100mg → 89.31mg Underfilled -10.7% | 99.184% | 0.82% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate GHK-Cu 100mg |
| Retatrutide 20MG | 20mg → 22.53mg Overfilled +12.7% | 99.102% | 0.90% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate Retatrutide 20MG |
| BC10 | Not measured | 99.362% | 0.64% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate BC10 |
| KPV10 | — → 12.02mg Not checked | 99.051% | 0.95% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate KPV10 |
| MT1 | — → 9.31mg Not checked | 99.48% | 0.52% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate MT1 |
| RETA-30 | — → 31.43mg Not checked | 99.561% | 0.44% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate RETA-30 |
| RT10 | — → 11.11mg Not checked | 99.619% | 0.38% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate RT10 |
| RT20 | — → 23.13mg Not checked | 99.782% | 0.22% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate RT20 |
Show all 16 certificates read ↓Showing all 16 certificates read
| Product | Label to measured | Purity | Main impurity | Lab | Certificate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RT30 | — → 32.72mg Not checked | 99.869% | 0.13% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate RT30 |
| Retatrutide CAS | Not measured | 97.89% | unidentified peak at 4.821 min 1.775% | ozcanium-analytics | Open certificate Retatrutide CAS |
| Retatrutide CAS | Not measured | 97.78% | unidentified peak at 4.832 min 1.787% | ozcanium-analytics | Open certificate Retatrutide CAS |
| Retatrutide CAS | Not measured | 98.36% | unidentified peak at 4.779 min 1.429% | ozcanium-analytics | Open certificate Retatrutide CAS |
| SS-31 10 | — → 11.98mg Not checked | 99.911% | 0.09% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate SS-31 10 |
| Selank CAS | Not measured | 97.98% | unidentified peak at 1.221 min 2.022% | ozcanium-analytics | Open certificate Selank CAS |
| TESA-10 | — → 10.36mg Not checked | 98.609% | 1.39% not itemised | janoshik | Open certificate TESA-10 |
| Tesamorelin CAS | Not measured | 98.31% | unidentified peak at 8.325 min 0.578% | ozcanium-analytics | Open certificate Tesamorelin CAS |
AUVerifiedPeps FAQ
Is AUVerifiedPeps legit?
We score AUVerifiedPeps 27 of 60, from reviews, community posts and the certificates they publish. We have not lab-tested them yet. The reasons for each part of the score are in the verdict above.
Does AUVerifiedPeps publish lab reports (COAs)?
Yes. We hold 21 certificates from their website. They cover 10 of the 15 peptides we track. Labs named on them: Janoshik and Ozcanium Analytics. We found 16 of them on the lab's own website. A certificate is the shop's own document, not our test.
How much does AUVerifiedPeps charge?
On 7 Nov 2026 we tracked 22 prices from A$29 to A$375. The cheapest is GHK-Cu at A$29. The full list is in the price table above.
Where does AUVerifiedPeps ship?
They ship to Australia.
Has Peptide Scanner tested AUVerifiedPeps?
Not yet. Lab results are worth 40 points, and those stay locked until we test one of their products at an independent lab.
We don't sell peptides. No shop pays for its score. How we score · What the badges mean · Report an issue with this page