PeptideScanner

How we score suppliers

By

Every supplier on Peptide Scanner gets a score out of 100. Below is where each point comes from, with the actual cut-offs, so you can check our work.

60

The most any supplier can score today, because we haven't lab-tested anyone yet.

2

The highest reputation mark a supplier can get after a credible scam report.

10

Reviews a supplier needs on our site before they count at all.

0

Certificate points for a supplier whose only lab reports are its own.

Four parts, 100 points

Each part measures something different. Pick one to see how it's worked out.

The score out of 100: our lab test 40 points (currently 0 for every supplier), outside reviews 20, community 15, certificates 25.

Why nobody can pass 60 yet

40 points are for our own test. We buy a vial like any customer would and send it to an independent lab, which checks what's inside and how pure it is. We haven't finished testing any supplier, so every score on the site is out of 60 for now, and the score box says so next to the number.

Every supplier today

44/60
PSV Trust ScoreTracked · capped at 60
Lab Verification· locked until tested0/40
External Reviews11/20
Community Signals15/15
Transparency18/25
Not yet independently tested · planned method HPLC and LC-MSMethodology →

How a tested supplier will look (example, not a real result)

82/100
PSV Trust ScoreVerified
Lab Verification38/40
External Reviews11/20
Community Signals15/15
Transparency18/25
Independently tested · HPLC and LC-MS · 14 May 2026 · batch BPC0426How we verify →

Outside reviews, 20 points

We read the supplier's rating and review count on independent external review sites. More reviews and a higher rating score higher. A supplier with only a handful of reviews is capped, so a few five-star reviews can't carry it. We don't publish the exact cut-offs here: they would tell a supplier how many fake reviews to buy.

What people say after they order

This part is reputation. It has two inputs, each marked out of 10: what we find about the supplier around the internet, and the reviews our own users leave on its page.

Internet reputation

We search Reddit, forums, YouTube, blogs and scam-checker sites, read what we find, and mark it. Bad reports weigh more than good ones: once there's a credible scam report, the mark can't go above 2, however many happy customers the supplier has elsewhere.

Internet reputation is marked 0 to 10. 0 to 2: documented scam or nobody talks about them. 3 to 5: a few or mixed mentions. 6 to 8: widely discussed and mostly positive. 9 to 10: long, consistent track record.

We re-run this search every week. Each supplier's page says what we found and why it got its mark.

Reviews on Peptide Scanner

These count for nothing until a supplier has 10 reviews here, so one review, or one angry customer, can't move the score. After that, the mark is points for how many reviews plus points for the average rating.

Points for how many reviews

2
10 to 19
3
20 to 29
4
30 to 49
5
50 to 99
6
100 or more

Points for the average rating

0
under 3.0
1
3.0 to 3.4
2
3.5 to 3.9
3
4.0 to 4.4
4
4.5 or more

How the two become 15 points

Under 10 reviews here, internet reputation fills all 15 points (its mark times 1.5). From 10 reviews on, the two marks are added and scaled down to 15 (the total times 0.75).

No reviews on our site yet

Internet reputation6 of 10
Reviews herenot used
6 × 1.59
Community9 / 15

35 reviews here, averaging 4.6 stars

Internet reputation6 of 10
35 reviews, 4.6 stars4 + 4 = 8
(6 + 8) × 0.7510.5
Community10.5 / 15

Do their lab reports back up the label?

A certificate of analysis (COA) is a lab report on one batch: which peptide it is, how pure it is and how much is in the vial. We download every COA a supplier publishes and read it ourselves. What the supplier writes on its product page counts for nothing on its own.

First, who ran the test

If none of a supplier's certificates came from an independent lab, it gets 0 for this whole part, and nothing below applies. That happens in four cases:

The supplier tested itself

A company testing its own product and naming no outside lab proves nothing.

Only factory paperwork

Manufacturer release documents aren't an independent test.

A report we can't verify

It names a real lab, but has no verification code and doesn't match how that lab issues reports.

No certificate at all

Decided only after we check their COA pages, product pages and product photos by hand.

A supplier that gets 0 here shows the reason and the evidence on its own page.

Publishing, up to 15 points

6
Who did the testing

6 for a Janoshik report we can verify, or two or more certificates from a named independent lab. 4 for one. 2 if the lab isn't clear.

4
How much of the range

The share of their peptides with a certificate. All of them earns 4; a quarter earns about 1.

3
How recent

Averaged over every certificate, not just the newest. Under 6 months counts in full, under a year two-thirds, under two years one-third.

2
Testing again

The share of tested peptides with certificates from two batches at least 30 days apart. Testing once at launch is easy.

Matching the label, up to 10 points

Only certificates from an independent lab count here. We compare each result with the label and with the purity the supplier advertises.

7
Amount in the vial

Within 3% of the label is full credit, 3 to 10% off is half, more than 10% off is nothing. Overfilled counts as wrong too: a “10mg” vial holding 13mg makes every dose 30% too strong.

3
Purity

At or above the advertised purity is full credit, up to 1 point below is half, anything lower is nothing. No advertised purity means we compare with 98%.

Points are the average credit across all results. If we could read fewer than 5, the supplier gets half the points rather than a guess, because a gap in our reading isn't its fault. A bad certificate never leaves a supplier worse off than having none.

A supplier with verified Janoshik reports

Who tested: several verified Janoshik reports6
Range: half their peptides tested2
Recency: all under 6 months3
Testing again: 1 in 4 peptides0.5
Vials: 12 read, 9 on label, 2 slightly off, 1 far off5.8
Purity: 10 read, all at or above the claim3
Certificates20.3 / 25

The vial line: 9 vials earn full credit, 2 earn half and 1 earns nothing. That's 10 out of 12, and 10/12 of 7 points is 5.8.

Every certificate we've read, and how each compared with the label, is public on Claims vs COA.

What each supplier page counts

Each supplier page shows three facts about its certificates. They are not points: they never change a score or the order of a list.

  • Products with a lab certificate. How many peptides in the supplier's product table have at least one certificate that names an independent lab. Each peptide counts once, and any tested size counts. CJC-1295 with and without DAC are two products. Blends are left out.
  • Found on the lab's own website. How many of the supplier's certificates we found in the issuing lab's online lookup. Many labs have no lookup, so a low number is not a bad sign.
  • Contamination tests. How many of its certificates also test for endotoxin, sterility or microbes, or heavy metals.

A certificate counts only when it is the supplier's own: not issued to another company and not copied from another supplier's website. “Not checked yet” means we have not finished checking. It is never a zero. Certificates we found in our 7-8 Oct 2026 re-scan have not been through the lab lookup yet: they count for products when they name a lab, and are not yet in the other two facts.

How results are ordered

The default sort, Best match, weighs trust over price.

70%

Trust. The score on this page. A supplier with scam reports has a low community mark, so it drops down the list on its own.

30%

Price. Price per milligram against every other supplier of the same peptide. Cheapest ranks highest.

Prices are re-checked weekly, so how recently one was checked doesn't change the order. If you only care about price, sort by Cheapest per mg.

The three badges

Verified means we tested it. Tracked means we watch it but haven't tested it yet. Flagged means we have evidence of a problem.

PSV VerifiedVerified· 14 May 2026
Independently tested · HPLC and LC-MS · 14 May 2026 · batch BPC0426See result →
PSV TrackedTracked
Not yet independently tested · planned method HPLC and LC-MSWhy not yet tested →
Flagged

Only used with documented reports of fake products or orders that never arrived. We never flag a supplier on a hunch.

Their certificate and our test stay separate

A supplier's certificate and our own test are different kinds of evidence, so we show them side by side instead of blending them. Until we've tested a supplier, our side says so.

Waiting for our test

Supplier's COA · their claim
99.2% claimed purity
Supplier HPLC · self-reported
PSV independent lab · our result
Not yet tested
In our testing queue. Not a negative signal.

Once our result is in (example)

Supplier's COA · their claim
99.2% claimed purity
Supplier HPLC · self-reported
PSV independent lab · our result
98.6% measured purity
HPLC and LC-MS · 14 May 2026

What a score can't tell you

We'd rather say what we don't know than overstate what we do.

Before we test

We haven't tested this supplier ourselves. We report what anyone can check: prices, listing history, reviews and the documents the supplier publishes. No PSV result doesn't mean a bad result.

After a test

A test tells you what was in one batch on one date: which peptide and how pure. It doesn't guarantee the next batch, and it says nothing about safety or effects in the body.

Peptide Scanner is an independent aggregator. All content is for research purposes only. We do not sell, ship, or endorse any product. Read full disclaimer →