Skye Peptides
monitored, not yet independently tested.
We do not sell or fulfil any product. This never affects rankings or scores.
Report an issue with this profileWhy this score
The score card above, in plain words. Every line comes from the data we hold on this supplier, nothing is written by hand.
Skye Peptides sits at 9 out of 60. Low. Most of the gap is transparency.
We have not lab-tested anything from them yet, so the 40 points for Lab Verification are off the table for now. What you see is built from three public signals.
Reviews: 4 of 20. under 50 reviews on third-party platforms, and the average is weak.
Community: 4.5 of 15. Forum and Reddit talk is thin or cautious. Nobody has posted a verified review on PeptideScanner yet, so this rests on what is said elsewhere.
Transparency: 0 of 25. They say they provide in-house certificates of analysis. We hold 28 of them; the newest is from Sep 2024. Of the certificates we list, 0 of 7 dated ones were issued in the last 6 months.
COA availability
The supplier's own published certificate is their statement. Our independent lab result is ours. We never merge the two.
- Found on the lab's own website
- Not checked yet
Nothing from this supplier has been through our lab check yet.
- Contamination tests
- Not checked yet
Nothing from this supplier has been through our check yet.
How we count this ยท Certificates on file as of 8 Oct 2026.
Skye Peptides states it provides in-house certificates of analysis for its products.
Certificate age. 0 of 7 dated certificates were issued in the last 6 months; 7 are over a year old. Newest: Sept 2024 (2 years 1 month old). Oldest: Dec 2023. Most of what they publish is over a year old, so it may not reflect current batches.
We have not independently lab-tested any product from this supplier. No PeptideScanner result is available โ this is not a negative signal, just no data yet.
Products & pricing (0)
Per-product price and $/mg for single peptides, sourced from live listings.
Community signals
A summary of public discussion โ a sibling signal, distinct from our verdict and our own reviews.
External reviews 4.3/33 polarized; the order-confirmed-then-'insurance fee'-then-ghosted pattern is still being reported (new external review ~Aug 2026: bait-and-switch, ghosted, no refund) alongside r/bpc_157 Jun 2025 and r/PurePeptides Feb 2026 scam complaints; allegations of planted fake Facebook profiles (7 Sep 2026); clone sites (skiepeptide.com) add attribution noise. worthepenny 4.2/46 and published COAs keep it off the floor, but the scam-pattern reports keep accumulating.
Customer reviews
This supplier has 0 products tracked and is monitored โ not yet independently tested. Be the first researcher to leave a review.
What the badges mean
We have independently lab-tested products from this supplier. The badge carries the test date and the named lab. Earned and rare โ no supplier holds it yet.
Monitored but not yet tested by us โ the default state for a supplier we are following. Trust Score capped at 60.
Documented counterfeit or non-delivery signals. Never presented as a recommendation in any sort order.
A published COA is not a badge tier. It is the supplier's own claim, shown separately above โ never merged with our independent result.